Journal of population therapeutics and clinical pharmacology = Journal de la therapeutique des populations et de la pharmacologie clinique · 2015
Palpebral fissure length measurement: accuracy of the FAS facial photographic analysis software and inaccuracy of the ruler.
Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Astley Susan J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Accurate fetal alcohol spectrum disorder diagnoses require accurate facial measurement. The Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS) Facial Photographic Analysis Software was developed to overcome measurement error known to occur with ruler measurement of the PFL. Recent publications have queried the Software's accuracy.
OBJECTIVES: 1) Demonstrate the Software's ability to accurately measure a PFL from a 2-dimensional digital facial photograph. 2) Demonstrate the frequency and magnitude of error when the PFL is measured directly by clinicians using a ruler.
METHODS: Objective 1: PFLs of mannequins were measured using the Software and a sliding digital caliper, with the latter serving as the gold-standard accurate measure. Mannequins allowed the caliper prongs to be placed directly on the landmarks that define the PFL. Objective 2: PFLs of 1,027 patients evaluated at the University of Washington FAS Diagnostic & Prevention Network were measured with the Software and directly by one or two clinicians using a ruler.
RESULTS: Objective 1: The Software derived PFLs that were identical to or within 0.2 mm of the caliper measures. Objective 2: There was tremendous inter-rater variability in PFLs measured by clinicians using a hand held ruler. Seventy-seven percent of patients had their PFLs measured incorrectly (greater than 1 mm error) by at least one of the two clinicians using a ruler.
CONCLUSION: The FAS Facial Photographic Analysis Software measures the PFL with the same accuracy as a sliding digital caliper, as it was programmed to do. Direct measurement of the PFL with a ruler is very prone to error.
OBJECTIVES: 1) Demonstrate the Software's ability to accurately measure a PFL from a 2-dimensional digital facial photograph. 2) Demonstrate the frequency and magnitude of error when the PFL is measured directly by clinicians using a ruler.
METHODS: Objective 1: PFLs of mannequins were measured using the Software and a sliding digital caliper, with the latter serving as the gold-standard accurate measure. Mannequins allowed the caliper prongs to be placed directly on the landmarks that define the PFL. Objective 2: PFLs of 1,027 patients evaluated at the University of Washington FAS Diagnostic & Prevention Network were measured with the Software and directly by one or two clinicians using a ruler.
RESULTS: Objective 1: The Software derived PFLs that were identical to or within 0.2 mm of the caliper measures. Objective 2: There was tremendous inter-rater variability in PFLs measured by clinicians using a hand held ruler. Seventy-seven percent of patients had their PFLs measured incorrectly (greater than 1 mm error) by at least one of the two clinicians using a ruler.
CONCLUSION: The FAS Facial Photographic Analysis Software measures the PFL with the same accuracy as a sliding digital caliper, as it was programmed to do. Direct measurement of the PFL with a ruler is very prone to error.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAnthropometryChildChild, PreschoolEquipment DesignEye AbnormalitiesFemaleFetal Alcohol Spectrum DisordersHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleManikinsMiddle AgedObserver VariationPhotographyPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsSoftware ValidationWashingtonYoung Adult