MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0887-6177(03)00024-6

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2004

Social processing deficits in agenesis of the corpus callosum: narratives from the Thematic Appreciation Test.

Paul Lynn K, Schieffer Beatrix, Brown Warren S

Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Clinical observations suggest that individuals with agenesis of the corpus callosum (ACC) and normal IQ may have deficits in social intelligence. This study analyzed responses by normally intelligent individuals with ACC to pictures from the Thematic Apperception Test. A rating system was developed to assess three elements of story-generation: story logic, social understanding, and common content. Six individuals with ACC (five complete and one partial; IQs > 85) were compared to eight controls matched for sex, age, and IQ. Based on independent rankings of story protocols by two raters, the five individuals with complete ACC were found to be significantly impaired on all three criteria. The one individual with partial ACC performed better than the majority of controls in all three domains. Results demonstrated that individuals with complete ACC are impaired in understanding socially complex scenes and generating appropriate narratives. Absence of the anterior corpus callosum appears to be important for this deficit.

Для цитирования: Paul Lynn K, Schieffer Beatrix, Brown Warren S. Social processing deficits in agenesis of the corpus callosum: narratives from the Thematic Appreciation Test.. Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists. 2004. DOI: 10.1016/s0887-6177(03)00024-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.