MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1071100717702848

Медицинская библиотека · Foot & ankle international · 2017

Biomechanical Analysis of Suture Anchor vs Tenodesis Screw for FHL Transfer.

Drakos Mark C, Gott Michael, Karnovsky Sydney C, Murphy Conor I, DeSandis Bridget A, Chinitz Noah, Grande Daniel, Chahine Nadeen

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Chronic Achilles injury is often treated with flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon transfer to the calcaneus using 1 or 2 incisions. A single incision avoids the risks of extended dissections yet yields smaller grafts, which may limit fixation options. We investigated the required length of FHL autograft and biomechanical profiles for suture anchor and biotenodesis screw fixation.

METHODS

Single-incision FHL transfer with suture anchor or biotenodesis screw fixation to the calcaneus was performed on 20 fresh cadaveric specimens. Specimens were cyclically loaded until maximal load to failure. Length of FHL tendon harvest, ultimate load, stiffness, and mode of failure were recorded.

RESULTS

Tendon harvest length needed for suture anchor fixation was 16.8 ± 2.1 mm vs 29.6 ± 2.4 mm for biotenodesis screw ( P = .002). Ultimate load to failure was not significantly different between groups. A significant inverse correlation existed between failure load and donor age when all specimens were pooled (ρ = -0.49, P < .05). Screws in younger specimens (fewer than 70) resulted in significantly greater failure loads ( P < .03). No difference in stiffness was found between groups. Modes of failure for screw fixation were either tunnel pullout (n = 6) or tendon rupture (n = 4). Anchor failure occurred mostly by suture breakage (n = 8).

CONCLUSION

Adequate FHL tendon length could be harvested through a single posterior incision for fixation to the calcaneus with either fixation option, but suture anchor required significantly less graft length. Stiffness, fixation strength, and load to failure were comparable between groups. An inverse correlation existed between failure load and donor age. Younger specimens with screw fixation demonstrated significantly greater failure loads.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Adequate harvest length for FHL transfer could be achieved with a single posterior incision. There was no difference in strength of fixation between suture anchor and biotenodesis screw.

Для цитирования: Drakos Mark C, Gott Michael, Karnovsky Sydney C, Murphy Conor I, DeSandis Bridget A, Chinitz Noah, Grande Daniel, Chahine Nadeen. Biomechanical Analysis of Suture Anchor vs Tenodesis Screw for FHL Transfer.. Foot & ankle international. 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1071100717702848.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.