DOI 10.1016/j.breast.2026.104796
Evaluation of a novel communication workshop for healthcare professionals working with metastatic breast cancer patients.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Numerous reports criticise the communication between patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and their health care providers (HCPs). System constraints may contribute to HCP burnout and compassion-fatigue, adding further to patient dissatisfaction. We developed and evaluated a novel communication skills training workshop based on verbatim quotes from a survey of patients with MBC.
METHODS
Prior to attendance at 6-h small group, facilitator-led workshops, participants completed: - General Health Questionnaire (GHQ12), Standford Fulfilment Index (SFI) and the navigating professional boundaries (NPB) questionnaire. Self-confidence discussing 9 key MBC issues was assessed pre- and post-workshop.
RESULTS
Sixty-six HCPs (20 surgeons, 26 oncologists, and 20 nurses) participated. Overall, 14/66 (21.2%) had GHQ12 scores of ≥4 indicating heightened psychological concerns, 21/66 (31.8%) had burnout and merely (21/66 (31.8%) felt professionally fulfilled by work. Higher anxiety levels (GHQ-12 ≥ 4) were associated with increased odds of burnout (OR = 6.0, 95% CI: 1.7 to 21.0, p = 0.0057) and reduced odds of professional fulfilment (OR = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.015 to 1.00, p = 0.052). The primary outcome of self-confidence communicating about 9 key issues improved significantly post-workshop (mean change = 1.5, 95%CI:1.14 to 1.81). Workshops were rated highly by all participants.
CONCLUSIONS
Bespoke small-group workshops using patient verbatims, and which addressed psychological and practice constraints inhibiting effective communication, significantly improved HCPs' self-confidence discussing challenging MBC consultations.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.