The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2021
In vitro activity of imipenem/relebactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, cefepime/zidebactam and other novel antibiotics against imipenem-non-susceptible Gram-negative bacilli from Taiwan.
СтатьяResearch Support, N.I.H., IntramuralПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kuo Shu-Chen, Wang Yung-Chih, Tan Mei-Chen, Huang Wei-Cheng, Shiau Yih-Ru, Wang Hui-Ying, Lai Jui-Fen, Huang I-Wen, Lauderdale Tsai-Ling
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the susceptibility of imipenem-non-susceptible Escherichia coli (INS-EC), Klebsiella pneumoniae (INS-KP), Acinetobacter baumannii (INS-AB) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (INS-PA) to novel antibiotics.
METHODS: MICs were determined using the broth microdilution method. Carbapenemase and ESBL phenotypic testing and PCR for genes encoding ESBLs, AmpCs and carbapenemases were performed.
RESULTS: Zidebactam, avibactam and relebactam increased the respective susceptibility rates to cefepime, ceftazidime and imipenem of 17 INS-EC by 58.8%, 58.8% and 70.6%, of 163 INS-KP by 77.9%, 88.3% and 76.1% and of 81 INS-PA by 45.7%, 38.3% and 85.2%, respectively. Vaborbactam increased the meropenem susceptibility of INS-EC by 41.2% and of INS-KP by 54%. Combinations of β-lactams and novel β-lactamase inhibitors or β-lactam enhancers (BLI-BLE) were inactive against 136 INS-AB. In 58 INS-EC and INS-KP with exclusively blaKPC-like genes, zidebactam, avibactam, relebactam and vaborbactam increased the susceptibility of the partner β-lactams by 100%, 96.6%, 84.5% and 75.9%, respectively. In the presence of avibactam, ceftazidime was active in an additional 85% of 20 INS-EC and INS-KP with exclusively blaOXA-48-like genes while with zidebactam, cefepime was active in an additional 75%. INS-EC and INS-KP with MBL genes were susceptible only to cefepime/zidebactam. The β-lactam/BLI-BLE combinations were active against INS-EC and INS-KP without detectable carbapenemases. For INS-EC, INS-KP and INS-AB, tigecycline was more active than omadacycline and eravacycline but eravacycline had a lower MIC distribution. Lascufloxacin and delafloxacin were active in <35% of these INS isolates.
CONCLUSIONS: β-Lactam/BLI-BLE combinations were active in a higher proportion of INS-EC, INS-KP and INS-PA. The susceptibility of novel fluoroquinolones and tetracyclines was not superior to that of old ones.
METHODS: MICs were determined using the broth microdilution method. Carbapenemase and ESBL phenotypic testing and PCR for genes encoding ESBLs, AmpCs and carbapenemases were performed.
RESULTS: Zidebactam, avibactam and relebactam increased the respective susceptibility rates to cefepime, ceftazidime and imipenem of 17 INS-EC by 58.8%, 58.8% and 70.6%, of 163 INS-KP by 77.9%, 88.3% and 76.1% and of 81 INS-PA by 45.7%, 38.3% and 85.2%, respectively. Vaborbactam increased the meropenem susceptibility of INS-EC by 41.2% and of INS-KP by 54%. Combinations of β-lactams and novel β-lactamase inhibitors or β-lactam enhancers (BLI-BLE) were inactive against 136 INS-AB. In 58 INS-EC and INS-KP with exclusively blaKPC-like genes, zidebactam, avibactam, relebactam and vaborbactam increased the susceptibility of the partner β-lactams by 100%, 96.6%, 84.5% and 75.9%, respectively. In the presence of avibactam, ceftazidime was active in an additional 85% of 20 INS-EC and INS-KP with exclusively blaOXA-48-like genes while with zidebactam, cefepime was active in an additional 75%. INS-EC and INS-KP with MBL genes were susceptible only to cefepime/zidebactam. The β-lactam/BLI-BLE combinations were active against INS-EC and INS-KP without detectable carbapenemases. For INS-EC, INS-KP and INS-AB, tigecycline was more active than omadacycline and eravacycline but eravacycline had a lower MIC distribution. Lascufloxacin and delafloxacin were active in <35% of these INS isolates.
CONCLUSIONS: β-Lactam/BLI-BLE combinations were active in a higher proportion of INS-EC, INS-KP and INS-PA. The susceptibility of novel fluoroquinolones and tetracyclines was not superior to that of old ones.