MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ijid.2026.108859

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2026

Efavirenz 400 vs 600 mg combined with lamivudine and tenofovir in treatment-naïve HIV-infected patients in China: A randomized, multi-centered, controlled trial.

Hang Qi, Ziyan Wang, Xiaojing Song, Min Wang, Haibo Ding, Hanhui Ye, Zhihao Meng, Shenghua He, Yun He, Linghua Li, Yinzhong Shen, Yong Xiong, Ping Ma, Taisheng Li

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Optimizing efavirenz (EFV) dosing to minimize adverse events (AEs) remains a critical issue. Studies indicate that reducing the EFV dose from 600 to 400 mg daily lowers side effect intensity while maintaining virological suppression. We previously showed that 600 mg daily EFV may lead to unnecessarily high exposure in Chinese patients, but the long-term efficacy and safety of dose reduction beyond 48 weeks in this population remain unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing EFV 400 vs 600 mg, each combined with lamivudine (3TC) and tenofovir (TDF), in antiretroviral therapy-naïve Chinese adults with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1. The primary endpoint was virological suppression (HIV-ribonucleic acid [RNA] <50 copies/ml) at week 72. A total of 422 participants were randomized (215 in the 400 mg group, 207 in the 600 mg group); 334 (169 and 165, respectively) completed the week 72 primary endpoint assessment, while an optional extension to week 96 was conducted for exploratory analyses.

RESULTS

At baseline, demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. At week 72, virological suppression (HIV-RNA <50 copies/ml) was achieved in 86.5% (186/215) of the EFV 400 mg group and 84.1% (174/207) of the EFV 600 mg group (difference +2.5 percentage points, 95% confidence interval -4.3 to 9.2, P = 0.57), meeting the noninferiority criteria. While overall AE profiles were comparable, the EFV 600 mg group exhibited a significantly higher incidence of serious nonrash AEs (P = 0.042), and a numerically higher but nonsignificant rate of drug discontinuation due to AEs (4.8% vs 1.9%, P = 0.094).

CONCLUSION

EFV 400 mg is noninferior to EFV 600 mg in treatment-naïve Chinese patients over 72 weeks, offering improved safety and tolerability.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: #NCT04463784 on ClinicalTrials.gov, Registered by Peking Union Medical College Hospital on April 1, 2018 (URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04463784).

Для цитирования: Hang Qi, Ziyan Wang, Xiaojing Song, Min Wang, Haibo Ding, Hanhui Ye, Zhihao Meng, Shenghua He, Yun He, Linghua Li, Yinzhong Shen, Yong Xiong, Ping Ma, Taisheng Li. Efavirenz 400 vs 600 mg combined with lamivudine and tenofovir in treatment-naïve HIV-infected patients in China: A randomized, multi-centered, controlled trial.. International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2026.108859.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.