MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/md.0000000000014320

Медицинская библиотека · Medicine · 2019

Atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia in a child with tricuspid atresia: A case report of catheter ablation.

Wang Yefeng, Liu Qiming, Deng Xicheng, Xiao Yunbin, Chen Zhi

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

RATIONALE: Atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) is the most common supraventricular tachycardia occurring in children. However, in complex congenital heart disease patients with a different heart anatomy and conduction system morphology, accessory pathway modification may be particularly challenging because of distortion of typical anatomic landmarks.

PATIENT CONCERNS: A 10-year-old boy with tricuspid atresia and history of bidirectional Glenn operation had recurrent chest distress and palpitation for 3 months. He had multiple hospitalizations for narrow-QRS tachycardia with poor hemodynamic tolerance, despite the use of adenosine and amiodarone.

DIAGNOSES: AVRT. Tricuspid atresia with secundum atrial septal defect, large ventricular septal defect, and right ventricular outflow tract stenosis.

INTERVENTIONS: Cardiac catheterization, electrophysiological examination, and ablation.

OUTCOMES: The child has not had a recurrent AVRT during 6 months of follow-up and is waiting for Fontan operation.

LESSONS: Since there is an increased risk of accessory pathways in patients with tricuspid atresia, all these patients should be checked before the Fontan operation to exclude congenital accessory pathways.

Для цитирования: Wang Yefeng, Liu Qiming, Deng Xicheng, Xiao Yunbin, Chen Zhi. Atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia in a child with tricuspid atresia: A case report of catheter ablation.. Medicine. 2019. DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000014320.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.