The Laryngoscope · 2026
Impact of Co-Morbid Immunocompromise in HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Weng Maxwell L, Vitkovska Tereza, Hwang Song Hon, Evans Lauran K, Yang Hong-Ho, Dann Christopher, Sajed Dipti, St John Maie A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To characterize the survival and morbidity associated with immunocompromised status in patients with surgically resected Human Papillomavirus positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV + OPSCC).
METHODS: We reviewed patients with surgically resected HPV + OPSCC at a tertiary institution between 2000 and 2023. The survival and morbidity associated with an immunocompromised status were assessed with multivariable Cox proportional hazards models controlling for patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics.
RESULTS: Among 278 patients with HPV+ OPSCC that met inclusion criteria, 14 patients were immunocompromised. Causes of immunocompromise: 4, leukemia or lymphoma; 3, organ transplantation; 3, medically immunosuppressed; 2, HIV; 2, myelodysplastic syndrome and pancytopenia. Adjusting for covariates, the immunocompromised patient group had significantly worse overall survival (64.3% vs. 91.7%; HR 4.12, 95% CI: 1.14-14.90, p < 0.005) compared to the non-compromised group. The immunocompromised patient group did not have a significantly different postoperative length of stay (3.96 vs. 3.5 days; aβ 0.66, 95% CI: -1.30 to 2.64).
CONCLUSIONS: In this small, heterogeneous cohort of surgically resected HPV + OPSCC, immunocompromised status was associated with significantly worse overall survival; however, these exploratory findings should be interpreted cautiously.
METHODS: We reviewed patients with surgically resected HPV + OPSCC at a tertiary institution between 2000 and 2023. The survival and morbidity associated with an immunocompromised status were assessed with multivariable Cox proportional hazards models controlling for patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics.
RESULTS: Among 278 patients with HPV+ OPSCC that met inclusion criteria, 14 patients were immunocompromised. Causes of immunocompromise: 4, leukemia or lymphoma; 3, organ transplantation; 3, medically immunosuppressed; 2, HIV; 2, myelodysplastic syndrome and pancytopenia. Adjusting for covariates, the immunocompromised patient group had significantly worse overall survival (64.3% vs. 91.7%; HR 4.12, 95% CI: 1.14-14.90, p < 0.005) compared to the non-compromised group. The immunocompromised patient group did not have a significantly different postoperative length of stay (3.96 vs. 3.5 days; aβ 0.66, 95% CI: -1.30 to 2.64).
CONCLUSIONS: In this small, heterogeneous cohort of surgically resected HPV + OPSCC, immunocompromised status was associated with significantly worse overall survival; however, these exploratory findings should be interpreted cautiously.