MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/bor.0000000000000425

Медицинская библиотека · Current opinion in rheumatology · 2017

Revisiting the role of steroids and aspirin in the management of acute Kawasaki disease.

Dhanrajani Anita, Yeung Rae S M

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Kawasaki disease is an acute multisystem childhood vasculitis with a predilection for the coronary arteries. The role of corticosteroids and acetyl salicylic acid (ASA) in the treatment of acute Kawasaki disease are matters of ongoing debate and changing attitudes from one extreme to the other. Recent work has provided new evidence to guide our thinking about these two therapeutic agents, which will be the focus of this review.

RECENT FINDINGS: Corticosteroids are effective and well tolerated in Kawasaki disease, both as initial adjunctive treatment in those at high-risk for poor outcome, and as rescue therapy after failed intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG).Higher doses of ASA (> 30 mg/kg/day) in the acute phase of Kawasaki disease, have no clear benefit over antiplatelet doses in improving coronary outcome.

SUMMARY: Corticosteroids should be used in patients at high-risk for poor coronary outcome, and in patients who fail IVIG. The absence of widely applicable and validated risk-scoring systems in Kawasaki disease outside of Japan remains a limiting factor to identify high-risk children. Current evidence does not demonstrate any advantage of high-dose over low-dose ASA in the acute phase of Kawasaki disease, in preventing coronary artery aneurysms.

Для цитирования: Dhanrajani Anita, Yeung Rae S M. Revisiting the role of steroids and aspirin in the management of acute Kawasaki disease.. Current opinion in rheumatology. 2017. DOI: 10.1097/bor.0000000000000425.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.