Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
Patient-reported outcomes of rezvilutamide versus bicalutamide in combination with androgen deprivation therapy in high-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients (CHART): a randomized, phase 3 study.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеКлиническое исследование III фазыМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Hongkai, Jiang Shusuan, Luo Hong, Zhou Fangjian, He Dalin, Ma Lulin, Guo Hongqian, Liang Chaozhao, Chong Tie, Jiang Jun, Chen Zhiwen, Wang Yong, Zou Qing, Tian Ye, Xiao Jun, Huang Jian, Chen Jinchao, Dong Qiang, Zhang Xiaoping, Li Hanzhong, Yang Xinfeng, Lian Jianpo, Wang Wenliang, Ye Dingwei
Аннотация
The randomized phase 3 CHART trial (NCT03520478) revealed that rezvilutamide (REZ) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in high-volume, metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) significantly enhanced radiographic progression-free and overall survival than bicalutamide (BIC)-ADT. Accordingly, we examined patient-reported outcomes (PROs) results, which were exploratory endpoints in the CHART trial. The patients were randomly allocated to receive REZ-ADT or BIC-ADT in a 1:1 ratio. The PROs were evaluated with the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) questionnaires. Both study groups displayed comparable baseline pain scores and functional status. Patients administered REZ-ADT had an extended time to progression of worst pain intensity in comparison to those treated with BIC-ADT (25th percentile, 9.2 [95% CI 7.4-16.6] vs. 6.4 months [95% CI 5.5-8.3]; HR 0.75 [95% CI 0.57-0.97]; p = 0.026). Similarly, patients received REZ-ADT exhibited a delayed time to progression of pain interference in comparison to those receiving BIC-ADT (25th percentile, 20.2 [95% CI 12.9-31.3] vs. 10.2 months [95% CI 7.4-11.1]; HR 0.70 [95% CI 0.52-0.93]; p = 0.015). Additionally, the REZ-ADT group demonstrated a prolonged delay in the deterioration of the total score on the FACT-P questionnaire (25th percentile, 12.8 [95% CI 7.4-20.3] vs. 6.0 months [95% CI 4.6-9.2]; HR 0.66 [95% CI 0.50-0.86]; p = 0.002), as well as most of the FACT-P subscale scores, in comparison to the BIC-ADT group. In conclusion, REZ-ADT is superior to BIC-ADT regarding the pain alleviation and enhancement of functional scales for high-volume mHSPC.