DOI 10.1016/j.acuro.2015.11.003
Voiding urosonography with second-generation contrast as a main tool for examining the upper and lower urinary tract in children. Pilot Study.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
In this series, we analyse the diagnostic efficacy of serial voiding urosonography (VUS) with second-generation contrast, combined harmoniously and specifically with contrast technology, in the examination of the urinary tract in children. This examination includes the diagnosis and follow-up for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and urethral disorders, mainly those of the posterior urethral valve (PUV).
PATIENTS AND
METHODS
After obtaining informed consent, a prospective study was conducted using urosonography with second-generation contrast (sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles, SonoVue®) from November 2014 to October 2015 (1 year) in paediatric patients with suspected VUR or PUV impairment. For patients with a high suspicion of VUR and in cases of PUV, we also conducted simultaneous voiding cystourethrography (VCUG).
RESULTS
We studied 40 patients (80 renal units) between the ages of 2 months and 13 years (median age, 14 months). The indication for the test was a suspected VUR (36 patients, group A) and PUV follow-up (4 patients, group B). The test was correlated with VCUG in 16 patients (12 cases with high suspicion of VUR in group A and with 4 cases of PUV in group B). The visualisation of the urethra was appropriate in cases of dilation or urethral stricture. For 3 of these patients with bilateral VUR demonstrated in the serial VUS, the VCUG showed only unilateral VUR in 2 of the patients and no VUR in 1 of the patients (κ=.73).
DISCUSSION: We have shown that the visualisation of the urethra is no longer a limitation and that serial VUS can be superior to conventional VCUG in diagnosing VUR.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.