DOI 10.1186/s12879-025-12111-x
Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing technology in hematologic malignancy patients with sepsis following antibiotic use.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has been widely applied in clinical pathogen detection; however, its utility in patients with hematologic malignancies complicated by sepsis after antibiotic therapy requires further investigation.
METHODS
A total of 119 patients with hematologic malignancies complicated by sepsis, who had received antibiotic treatment for ≥ 3 days without clinical improvement, were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent simultaneous blood culture and mNGS analysis. The diagnostic value of mNGS and its impact on optimizing anti-infective therapy were evaluated.
RESULTS
For the detection of bacterial and fungal pathogens, mNGS demonstrated a significantly higher positive rate compared to blood culture (89.36% vs. 25.53%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of mNGS were 58.33%, 0.00%, 16.67%, and 0.00%, respectively. The overall agreement rate between the two methods was 13.21% (kappa = -0.202). Based on mNGS results, anti-infective treatment regimens were modified in 47 patients (39.49%). Granulocytopenia related to antitumor therapy was identified as a high-risk factor for polymicrobial infections (P < 0.05)
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with hematologic malignancies and sepsis, particularly those with antitumor therapy-induced granulocytopenia, are at increased risk for polymicrobial infections. Blood mNGS offers a rapid and comprehensive approach to pathogen identification, showing significant potential for guiding anti-infective therapy in this patient population. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.