MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1109/embc.2019.8857569

Медицинская библиотека · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2019

Comparison of Extreme Learning Machine and K-Nearest Neighbour Performance in Classifying EEG Signal of Normal, Poor and Capable Dyslexic Children.

Zainuddin A Z A, Mansor W, Lee Khuan Y, Mahmoodin Z

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Dyslexia is a specific learning difficulty associated with brain capability in processing numbers and letters. Analysis of Electroencephalogram (EEG) could provide insight information on differences in brain processing. In this work, two machine learning techniques were applied to distinguish EEG signals of normal, poor and capable dyslexic children during writing word and non-word. The performance of k-nearest neighbour (KNN) with correlation distance function and extreme learning machine (ELM) with radial basis function (RBF) were compared. The performance of each classifier was determined using sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. It was found that ELM was capable of classifying the dyslexic children with 89% accuracy compared to KNN which is only 83%. These results showed that ELM is feasible and reliable in recognising normal, poor and capable dyslexic children through writing.

Для цитирования: Zainuddin A Z A, Mansor W, Lee Khuan Y, Mahmoodin Z. Comparison of Extreme Learning Machine and K-Nearest Neighbour Performance in Classifying EEG Signal of Normal, Poor and Capable Dyslexic Children.. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference. 2019. DOI: 10.1109/embc.2019.8857569.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.