DOI 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104571
Reporting of child physical abuse by a group of Brazilian primary care health professionals and associated factors.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Evidences points to the importance of health professionals to recognize child abuse, but also to a high frequency of underreporting, even in countries where reporting is mandatory, like Brazil.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the frequency of non-reporting behavior of child physical abuse (CPA) among Brazilian primary care health professionals who recognized some cases in their careers and associated factors with reporting.
METHODS
Cross-sectional study conducted with a representative sample of dentists, nurses, family physicians, and pediatricians from the Family Health Strategy network in the city of Belo Horizonte, Brazil. A validated self-administered questionnaire for use in Brazil was applied in-person to professionals in 2014 and 2015. Pearson's chi-squared test (p < 0.05) and a binary logistic regression model was used.
RESULTS
A total of 715 professionals participated (response rate: 98.89%), 414 (57.3%) recognized cases, of which 171 (41.3%) reported. Reporting was associated with the type of profession, as pediatricians reported cases more than dentists [OR = 6.05 (95% CI: 1.24-29.50)], with the willingness to become involved [OR = 2.01 (95% CI: 1.02-3.97)] and knowledge regarding where to report cases [OR = 2.68 (95% CI: 1.25-5.74)]. Confidentiality was the barrier associated with a lower probability of reporting CPA cases [OR = 0.22 (95% CI: 0.08-0.66)].
CONCLUSIONS
There is a high frequency of non-reporting behavior. Pediatricians reported more CPA cases, followed by family doctors and nurses. Dentists were those who reported fewer cases. Reporting was also associated with a willingness to be involved in detecting/reporting abuse and knowing where to report CPA.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.