Effectiveness and safety of ainuovirine plus lamivudine and tenofovir DF in virologically suppressed people living with HIV-1: the 48-week results of a multicenter, real-world study.

HIV-1 treatment has advanced with various antiretroviral regimens. Although efavirenz (EFV)-based regimens have been widely used, current guidelines recommend integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based therapy as first-line. However, INSTI may cause weight gain and adverse lipid changes, creating new unmet metabolic needs. Novel agents like ainuovirine (ANV), a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), may offer effective virological suppression (VS) with improved tolerability, but their long-term real-world safety and effectiveness remain unclear. This was a multicenter, retrospective observational cohort study. Virologically suppressed adults on a tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)/3TC+EFV regimen were either switched to TDF/3TC+ANV (ANV group) based on the physician's discretion or continued on TDF/3TC+EFV (EFV group). Baseline demographic and clinical data were collected, and participants were followed for 48 weeks. The primary effectiveness outcome was the proportion of patients achieving HIV-1 RNA levels below the limit of quantification (LOQ) at week 48. Secondary outcomes included absolute or percentage changes from baseline in CD4+ T-cell count, CD4+/CD8+ ratio. Key secondary safety outcomes included absolute changes from baseline in body weight, BMI, fasting lipid profiles (total cholesterol [TC], triglycerides [TG], high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C], low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C]), and parameters of liver and renal function. A total of 350 participants who completed the 48-week follow-up were included, comprising 170 patients in the ANV group and 180 patients who remained on EFV. At week 48, the proportion of VS was 96.5% in the ANV group and 96.1% in the EFV group (difference: 1.00 percentage points; 95% CI: -2.77 to 2.77), confirming non-inferiority. No significant differences in CD4+ T-cell recovery or CD4+/CD8+ ratios were observed. The ANV group experienced significantly less weight gain than the EFV group (estimated treatment difference [ETD]: -0.79 kg; P < 0.001). A corresponding trend in BMI change was observed but did not reach statistical significance. ANV also led to more favorable lipid changes, including a significant reduction in total cholesterol (ETD: -0.52 mmol/L; P < 0.001) and triglycerides (ETD: -0.83 mmol/L; P < 0.001) compared to EFV. Liver and renal function profiles remained stable in both groups. Switching from EFV- to an ANV-based regimen effectively maintained VS and led to improved metabolic parameters, including less weight gain and a more favorable lipid profile. As an alternative switch strategy, the ANV-based regimen may be a more beneficial option for people living with HIV (PLWH) who are at high risk of weight-related or dyslipidemia-associated comorbidities.