MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1538574408329269

Медицинская библиотека · Vascular and endovascular surgery · 2009

Endovascular repair of innominate artery injury secondary to air rifle pellet: a case report and review of the literature.

Gifford Shaun M, Deel John T, Dent Daniel L, Seenu Reddy V, Rasmussen Todd E

Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Decreased morbidity makes endovascular treatment preferable for certain central aortic and great vessel injuries. We present a case of penetrating innominate injury, describe considerations of a catheter-based approach, and provide follow-up of repair.

METHODS

A case report and review of the literature.

RESULTS

A 16-year-old man presented with an isolated innominate artery injury following an air rifle wound. Standard transfemoral approach was used to gain access the innominate artery. The injury was treated with an 8 x 35 mm, balloon-expandable, covered stent. Completion imaging confirmed a well-positioned stent with exclusion of the injury and normal flow in distal vessels. There were no symptoms of stent migration or stenosis 1 year following the injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific anatomic characteristics including its proximity to the carotid and vertebral arteries make the endovascular approach to the innominate artery unique. This case demonstrates the viability of catheter-based approaches in treating vascular injury.

Для цитирования: Gifford Shaun M, Deel John T, Dent Daniel L, Seenu Reddy V, Rasmussen Todd E. Endovascular repair of innominate artery injury secondary to air rifle pellet: a case report and review of the literature.. Vascular and endovascular surgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1177/1538574408329269.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.