DOI 10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100675
Economic evaluation of the one-dose HPV vaccination program in Nigeria.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
This study retrospectively examines the cost-effectiveness of the national HPV vaccination program using the program cost and coverage data in Nigeria.
METHODS
We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of the HPV vaccination program compared with no vaccination in Nigeria, adopting both health system and societal perspectives. A static Markov model simulating HPV infection and cervical cancer outcomes was developed for a cohort of girls aged 9-14 years, followed until age 100. The model comprised primarily the following health states: susceptible, cervical cancer, and death. It further incorporated three additional pathways for patients with cervical cancer, including those with successful treatment, with treatment failure, and with no treatment.
RESULTS
The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated at $268.67 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained from the health system perspective and $217.85 per QALY gained from the societal perspective. Both ICERs were well below the cost-effectiveness threshold of one-time GDP per capita in Nigeria ($806.95). Key drivers of cost-effectiveness included vaccine cost, treatment success rate, cervical cancer treatment coverage, and cervical cancer utility values.
DISCUSSION: The single-dose HPV vaccination program is highly cost-effective in Nigeria, compared to the status quo of no vaccination. To ensure long-term sustainability, the Nigerian government should strengthen financing mechanisms and the healthcare system to support the program.
POLICY SUMMARY: Single dose HPV vaccination is cost-effective in Nigeria. It is crucial to obtain sustainable vaccine financing and improve treatment to maintain the program impact.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.