Journal of medical entomology · 2026
Evaluation of a modified next-generation sequencing assay to detect Borrelia, Anaplasma, and Babesia in blood and ear tissue samples from field-collected rodents.
СтатьяОценочное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hojgaard Andrias, Grimaudo Alexander T, Osikowicz Lynn M, Maes Sarah E, Clark Jacoby, Williams Scott C, Linske Megan A, Eisen Lars, Eisen Rebecca J
Аннотация
Efforts to monitor the expanding geographic distribution of pathogens associated with Ixodes scapularis Say (Acari: Ixodidae), and to evaluate the outcomes of environmental control interventions aiming to reduce the intensity of enzootic transmission of these pathogens, are dependent on sensitive and specific molecular assays for detection of pathogens in ticks and their rodent hosts. In this study, we modified a highly sensitive and specific multiplex PCR amplicon sequencing assay developed to identify pathogens in Ixodes ticks for use in screening blood or ear tissue from rodents (Peromyscus leucopus Rafinesque (Rodentia: Cricetidae)) to detect Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto Johnson, Schmid, Hyde, Steigerwalt and Brenner (Spirochaetales: Spirochaetaceae), Borrelia miyamotoi Fukunaga (Spirochaetales: Spirochaetaceae), Anaplasma phagocytophilum (Foggie, 1949) Dumler (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae), and Babesia microti Franca, 1910 (Piroplasmida: Babesiidae). The modified assay retained similarly high sensitivity to the original assay for detection of Bo. burgdorferi sensu stricto, Bo. miyamotoi, A. phagocytophilum, and Ba. microti. However, the probability of detecting each of the pathogens was dependent on the sample type (ear tissue or blood) tested. Generally, pathogens were detected in either ear tissue or blood samples from an individual mouse, but not in both sample types highlighting the need to test both blood and ear tissue from all individual animals to accurately categorize their infection status.