MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/10601338809031990

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical research practices and drug regulatory affairs · 1988

Comparison of efficacy of ginger with various antimotion sickness drugs.

Wood C D, Manno J E, Wood M J, Manno B R, Mims M E, New Collective Author

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: Ginger and several other medications were compared with scopolamine and d-amphetamine for effectiveness in prevention of motion sickness.

METHODS

Double-blind techniques were used. The subjects were given the medications two hours before they were rotated in a chair making head movements until a symptom total short of vomiting was reached. Standardized N.A.S.A. techniques were used for speed of rotation and end-point of motion sickness.

RESULTS

The three doses of ginger were all at the placebo level of efficacy. Amitriptyline, ethopropazine and trihexyphenidyl increased the tolerated head movements but the increase was not statistically significant. Significant levels of protection were produced by dimenhydrinate, promethazine, scopolamine and d-amphetamine. Protection was further increased by combination of these latter drugs with d-amphetamine. Efficacy was greatest as the dose was increased.

CONCLUSIONS

The medication of choice in this study was scopolamine 0.6 mg with d-amphetamine 10 mg. This combination provided good protection with acceptable side effects.

Для цитирования: Wood C D, Manno J E, Wood M J, Manno B R, Mims M E, New Collective Author. Comparison of efficacy of ginger with various antimotion sickness drugs.. Clinical research practices and drug regulatory affairs. 1988. DOI: 10.3109/10601338809031990.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.