MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.02.053

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2018

Paradoxical Brain Embolism in Elderly Subjects with Small Atrial Septal Defects.

Kitamura Taisuke, Arakawa Shuji, Murao Kei, Kitazono Takanari, Ago Tetsuro

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Atrial septal defects have a low prevalence in the general population, and are recognized as a rare cause of paradoxical brain embolism.

METHODS

We extensively examined stroke causes in patients with acute stroke admitted to a single stroke center within 1 year.

RESULTS

Among 186 consecutive patients, transesophageal or transthoracic echocardiography revealed 5 cases of paradoxical brain embolism: 3 (1.6%) were related to atrial septal defects, whereas 2 were patent foramen ovale patients. Although right-to-left shunt may have occurred after the development of acute pulmonary embolism in atrial septal defects case #1, the Valsalva maneuver elicited right-to-left shunt in atrial septal defects cases #2 and #3. The 3 cases were elderly (>60 years old), harbored small defects with normal systemic hemodynamics, and had not experienced any clinical symptoms related to atrial septal defects.

CONCLUSIONS

Small atrial septal defect may cause paradoxical embolism as its initial related event, particularly in elderly subjects.

Для цитирования: Kitamura Taisuke, Arakawa Shuji, Murao Kei, Kitazono Takanari, Ago Tetsuro. Paradoxical Brain Embolism in Elderly Subjects with Small Atrial Septal Defects.. Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.02.053.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.