MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1994.tb02019.x

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical pharmacology · 1994

A retrospective study of promethazine and its failure to produce the expected incidence of sedation during space flight.

Bagian J P, Ward D F

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Since March 1989, intramuscular (IM) promethazine has been successfully used to treat the symptoms of space motion sickness. The incidence of sedation associated with promethazine administration on the ground is large and may result in operational impact. The authors undertook a retrospective study to quantify the incidence of sedation from promethazine use during Space Shuttle flights. Crew medical debriefings from 14 shuttle missions were reviewed for crew members who had been treated with IM promethazine and their corresponding symptoms were identified. Twenty-one crew members received IM promethazine (25-50 mg), and only one experienced any associated sedation with no operational impact. This sedation incidence of less that 5% is in stark contrast to the 60 to 73% incidence of sedation seen in ground-based studies. The incidence of sedation during space flight from IM promethazine is substantially less than that seen on the ground and does not present an operational problem during Space Shuttle flights. Future investigations of environmental stressors and pharmacodynamic changes associated with space flight may explain the huge disparity between the space-flight and ground-based data.

Для цитирования: Bagian J P, Ward D F. A retrospective study of promethazine and its failure to produce the expected incidence of sedation during space flight.. Journal of clinical pharmacology. 1994. DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1994.tb02019.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.