MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/jar.13204

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2024

Cognitive reserve proxies for individuals with intellectual developmental disability: A scoping review.

Pucci Veronica, La Face Annalisa, Gasteiger-Klicpera Barbara, Mondini Sara

СтатьяScoping ReviewПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Cognitive reserve (CR) has not been studied in people with Intellectual Developmental Disability, a population with a high incidence of dementia. Commonly adopted CR proxies should be adapted to reflect more specifically the experiences of people with Intellectual Developmental Disability.

METHOD: This scoping review intended to identify CR proxies relevant to people with this condition.

RESULTS

Some of these were the same already detected in a population without intellectual disabilities (education, occupation, physical activity, leisure, community and social activities); others were found to be specifically relevant for this population: type of schooling, parental educational level, environmental stimulation and living place.

CONCLUSIONS

These proxies need to be considered in studies on CR and Intellectual Developmental Disability and in clinical practice. Research on the protective effect of CR aims to encourage policies promoting lifestyle-based educational and preventive interventions and overcome participation barriers for people with Intellectual Developmental Disability.

Для цитирования: Pucci Veronica, La Face Annalisa, Gasteiger-Klicpera Barbara, Mondini Sara. Cognitive reserve proxies for individuals with intellectual developmental disability: A scoping review.. Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID. 2024. DOI: 10.1111/jar.13204.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.