MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.05.038

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2020

eNose breath prints as a surrogate biomarker for classifying patients with asthma by atopy.

Abdel-Aziz Mahmoud I, Brinkman Paul, Vijverberg Susanne J H, Neerincx Anne H, de Vries Rianne, Dagelet Yennece W F, Riley John H, Hashimoto Simone, Montuschi Paolo, Chung Kian Fan, Djukanovic Ratko, Fleming Louise J, Murray Clare S, Frey Urs, Bush Andrew, Singer Florian, Hedlin Gunilla, Roberts Graham, Dahlén Sven-Erik, Adcock Ian M, Fowler Stephen J, Knipping Karen, Sterk Peter J, Kraneveld Aletta D, Maitland-van der Zee Anke H, U-BIOPRED Study Group, Amsterdam UMC Breath Research Group

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Electronic noses (eNoses) are emerging point-of-care tools that may help in the subphenotyping of chronic respiratory diseases such as asthma.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate whether eNoses can classify atopy in pediatric and adult patients with asthma.

METHODS

Participants with asthma and/or wheezing from 4 independent cohorts were included; BreathCloud participants (n = 429), Unbiased Biomarkers in Prediction of Respiratory Disease Outcomes adults (n = 96), Unbiased Biomarkers in Prediction of Respiratory Disease Outcomes pediatric participants (n = 100), and Pharmacogenetics of Asthma Medication in Children: Medication with Anti-Inflammatory Effects 2 participants (n = 30). Atopy was defined as a positive skin prick test result (≥3 mm) and/or a positive specific IgE level (≥0.35 kU/L) for common allergens. Exhaled breath profiles were measured by using either an integrated eNose platform or the SpiroNose. Data were divided into 2 training and 2 validation sets according to the technology used. Supervised data analysis involved the use of 3 different machine learning algorithms to classify patients with atopic versus nonatopic asthma with reporting of areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves as a measure of model performance. In addition, an unsupervised approach was performed by using a bayesian network to reveal data-driven relationships between eNose volatile organic compound profiles and asthma characteristics.

RESULTS

Breath profiles of 655 participants (n = 601 adults and school-aged children with asthma and 54 preschool children with wheezing [68.2% of whom were atopic]) were included in this study. Machine learning models utilizing volatile organic compound profiles discriminated between atopic and nonatopic participants with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of at least 0.84 and 0.72 in the training and validation sets, respectively. The unsupervised approach revealed that breath profiles classifying atopy are not confounded by other patient characteristics.

CONCLUSION

eNoses accurately detect atopy in individuals with asthma and wheezing in cohorts with different age groups and could be used in asthma phenotyping.

Для цитирования: Abdel-Aziz Mahmoud I, Brinkman Paul, Vijverberg Susanne J H, Neerincx Anne H, de Vries Rianne, Dagelet Yennece W F, Riley John H, Hashimoto Simone, Montuschi Paolo, Chung Kian Fan, Djukanovic Ratko, Fleming Louise J, Murray Clare S, Frey Urs, Bush Andrew, Singer Florian, Hedlin Gunilla, Roberts Graham, Dahlén Sven-Erik, Adcock Ian M, Fowler Stephen J, Knipping Karen, Sterk Peter J, Kraneveld Aletta D, Maitland-van der Zee Anke H, U-BIOPRED Study Group, Amsterdam UMC Breath Research Group. eNose breath prints as a surrogate biomarker for classifying patients with asthma by atopy.. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.05.038.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.