Compared study of Asian reduction malarplasty: wedge-section osteotomy versus conventional procedures.

OBJECTIVE

The zygomatic body and arch are usually prominent in Asians; therefore, malar reduction is one of the most popular procedures for aesthetic facial contouring. The purpose of this study was to establish a new option for reduction malarplasty and analyze the merits and demerits of conventional operative techniques, thus searched for more effective and reliable surgical procedures.

METHODS

Records of 570 patients who underwent reduction malarplasty in our center from 1988 to 2008 were reviewed in this study. Several introduced malar reduction techniques were used until an alternative wedge-section osteotomy technique was performed by the senior author (X.M.) in 2002. This new technique consisted wedge-section osteotomy of the lower zygomatic body via intraoral approach and greenstick infracture of the posterior zygomatic arch through a tiny sideburn stab incision. In this way, the prominent malar complex could be reduced by being pressed inward and stabilized by only surgical suture in moderation. The surgical indications, major complications, and patient satisfaction of different techniques were compared.

RESULTS

In our experience, intraoral incision was better than coronal incision because of less iatrogenic scar formation and postoperative complications. Our wedge-section osteotomy was more effective and reliable as compared with other conventional methods.

CONCLUSION

Recently, intraoral and minor preauricular incision for malar reduction was more likely acceptable by surgeon as a typical procedure. Our new method was proven to be a safe, effective, and easily handled technique for malar complex reduction and thus was an optimal strategy for aesthetic facial shaping in Asians.