MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1819.1988.tb01340.x

Медицинская библиотека · The Japanese journal of psychiatry and neurology · 1988

Mono- or polytherapy and the severity of epilepsies.

Fukushima K

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

1. Out of 295 outpatients who were followed up by our staff for longer than 4 years, a total of 196 patients was subjected to this retrospective study. The inclusion criterion was that they had inevitably been placed on polytherapy of two or more anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs). In other words, they had failed to reach monotherapy for some reasons. 2. One of the determinant factors for the success or failure of monotherapy was the type of epilepsies. Namely, primary generalized epilepsy (PGE) was relatively easy to attain by monotherapy regardless of the seizure type, whereas secondary generalized epilepsy (SGE) with combined seizures and secondary partial epilepsy (SPE) with mixed seizures were not infrequently difficult to be placed on a monotherapy regimen. In the latter case, however, an abrupt withdrawal of AEDs was apt to cause an exacerbation of seizures. 3. There were some patients who could reach a complete freedom from seizures as a result of bi- or polytherapy and became socially adaptable and acceptable. They themselves are, if not all, afraid of a possible relapse of seizures produced by a reduction in the number of AEDs hitherto prescribed. In some cases, a family member may refuse monotherapy, or even physicians are reluctant to switch to monotherapy because the patients have experienced status epilepticus in the past.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Для цитирования: Fukushima K. Mono- or polytherapy and the severity of epilepsies.. The Japanese journal of psychiatry and neurology. 1988. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.1988.tb01340.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.