Orthodontics & craniofacial research · 2011
The effects of testosterone on craniosynostotic calvarial cells: a test of the gene/environmental model of craniofacial anomalies.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cray J J, Durham E L, Smalley M A, Finegold D N, Siegel M I, Losee J E, Mooney M P, Cooper G M
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The gene-environmental interaction model for craniofacial development proposes that if a genetic predisposition for an anomaly is coupled with an environmental factor that can exacerbate this predisposition, more severe phenotypes will result. Here, we utilize cells derived from our non-syndromic rabbit model of craniosynostosis to test the hypothesis that an insult, testosterone (TP) administration (exogenous source) will alter the osteogenic activity of these cells.
DESIGN: Calvarial cells from wild-type (WT) (N=13) or craniosynostotic (CS) rabbits (N=11) were stimulated with TP, an androgen receptor blocker, flutamide, and combined treatments. Proliferation and differentiation assays were conducted after 7 days. anova and t-tests were used to determine differences in stimulation and cell type.
RESULTS: The CS cells had significantly greater proliferation after TP administration compared to WT. There were no appreciable changes in differentiation after TP stimulation. Flutamide administration or combined TP and flutamide administration decreased both proliferation and differentiation for both cell types similarly.
CONCLUSIONS: Testosterone exposure caused an increase in cell proliferation for CS osteoblast cells. However, a therapy targeted to mitigate this response (flutamide therapy) similarly affected CS and WT cells, suggesting that the administration of flutamide or TP in the presence of flutamide decreases osteogenesis of these cells. Thus, although our data support a mechanism of gene-environmental interaction, these results would not support a therapeutic intervention based on this interaction.
DESIGN: Calvarial cells from wild-type (WT) (N=13) or craniosynostotic (CS) rabbits (N=11) were stimulated with TP, an androgen receptor blocker, flutamide, and combined treatments. Proliferation and differentiation assays were conducted after 7 days. anova and t-tests were used to determine differences in stimulation and cell type.
RESULTS: The CS cells had significantly greater proliferation after TP administration compared to WT. There were no appreciable changes in differentiation after TP stimulation. Flutamide administration or combined TP and flutamide administration decreased both proliferation and differentiation for both cell types similarly.
CONCLUSIONS: Testosterone exposure caused an increase in cell proliferation for CS osteoblast cells. However, a therapy targeted to mitigate this response (flutamide therapy) similarly affected CS and WT cells, suggesting that the administration of flutamide or TP in the presence of flutamide decreases osteogenesis of these cells. Thus, although our data support a mechanism of gene-environmental interaction, these results would not support a therapeutic intervention based on this interaction.