MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4997/jrcpe.2021.304

Медицинская библиотека · The journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh · 2021

Remote risk-stratification of dyspnoea in acute respiratory disorders: a systematic review of the literature.

Ponnapalli Anuradha, Khare Yuti, Dominic Catherine, Ganesh Shivani, Bhalla Gaurav, Gokani Shyam Ajay

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Telephone and video-based triage of dyspnoea has become commonplace and clinicians are faced with a new challenge in risk stratification of patients with dyspnoea due to suspected COVID-19. This review aimed to identify existing remote assessment modalities for acute dyspnoea which can be applied during pandemics.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library and medRxiv for studies of remote assessment of dyspnoea [PROSPERO ID: CRD42020202292]. A total of 3014 abstracts were screened independently by two reviewers and 32 studies were progressed to full text screening.

RESULTS

Five studies met the inclusion criteria. Commonly assessed clinical features included respiratory rate, work of breathing, counting time and mental status. All studies found remote triage modalities to be appropriate for detecting severe respiratory distress or the need for emergency level care.

CONCLUSION

Evidence-based tools to remotely assess dyspnoea will reduce resource strain during current and future pandemics.

Для цитирования: Ponnapalli Anuradha, Khare Yuti, Dominic Catherine, Ganesh Shivani, Bhalla Gaurav, Gokani Shyam Ajay. Remote risk-stratification of dyspnoea in acute respiratory disorders: a systematic review of the literature.. The journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. 2021. DOI: 10.4997/jrcpe.2021.304.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.