Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2011
[Treatment for esophageal perforations: analysis of 11 cases].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Arslan Ersin, Sanlı Maruf, Işık Ahmet Feridun, Tunçözgür Bülent, Uluşan Ahmet, Elbeyli Levent
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We present 11 cases with esophageal perforations who were treated in our department, with the intent of underlining the importance of surgical intervention.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 11 cases of esophageal perforation who were treated from 2005 to 2010. The cases diagnosed within the first 24 hours were regarded as early diagnoses; those diagnosed later than this period were regarded as late diagnoses.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 45.8 years. Following the perforation, 3 of the patients had early diagnoses and the others had late diagnoses. Of the 3 cases with early diagnosis, all had primary repair; of the late diagnosis cases, 4 had primary repair, 2 had colonic interposition, 1 had stent implantation, and 1 received medical treatment. All the cases with late diagnoses underwent drainage. The 3 cases who received early treatment recovered without complications. Of the other 8 cases, 1 had leakage from the anastomosis and 1 developed a fistula. Two (18.1%) of our patients died.
CONCLUSION: Treatments performed before the development of mediastinitis are lifesaving in esophageal perforation patients. We think that surgical treatment performed within the first 72 hours that includes primary repair would yield favorable results.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 11 cases of esophageal perforation who were treated from 2005 to 2010. The cases diagnosed within the first 24 hours were regarded as early diagnoses; those diagnosed later than this period were regarded as late diagnoses.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 45.8 years. Following the perforation, 3 of the patients had early diagnoses and the others had late diagnoses. Of the 3 cases with early diagnosis, all had primary repair; of the late diagnosis cases, 4 had primary repair, 2 had colonic interposition, 1 had stent implantation, and 1 received medical treatment. All the cases with late diagnoses underwent drainage. The 3 cases who received early treatment recovered without complications. Of the other 8 cases, 1 had leakage from the anastomosis and 1 developed a fistula. Two (18.1%) of our patients died.
CONCLUSION: Treatments performed before the development of mediastinitis are lifesaving in esophageal perforation patients. We think that surgical treatment performed within the first 72 hours that includes primary repair would yield favorable results.