The Laryngoscope · 2002
Neck crepitance: evaluation and management of suspected upper aerodigestive tract injury.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Goudy Steven L, Miller Frank B, Bumpous Jeffrey M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine safe criteria for the management of patients with crepitance of the neck.
HYPOTHESIS: Upper aerodigestive tract injury may lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Historically, this kind of injury has been managed by immediate surgical exploration, repair, and drainage. More recently, a nonoperative approach has been advocated.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of patients admitted to the University of Louisville Trauma Center with suspected upper aerodigestive tract injury.
METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 236 patients admitted to the trauma service from 1995 to 1999 with the diagnosis of aerodigestive tract injury or subcutaneous emphysema.
RESULTS: Nineteen patients were identified with cervical emphysema or cervical crepitance, or both, thought to be caused by an upper aerodigestive tract injury. The average patient age was 38.5 years; 68% of patients were men. The mechanisms of injury were motor vehicle accident (43%), gunshot wound (37%), assault (10%), blunt neck trauma (5%), and stabbing (5%). Each patient presented with cervical emphysema shown by radiograph or crepitance, or both; 21% had dysphagia and 63% were hoarse or had stridor. Location of the injury was tracheal or laryngeal in 37%, hypopharyngeal in 27%, oral pharynx in 16%, esophageal in 5%, and unidentified in 15% of patients. Because of suspected aerodigestive tract injury, 79% of patients were taken to the operating room for direct laryngoscopy and esophagoscopy, and abnormalities were found in 80%. The diameter of the average laceration of the upper aerodigestive tract was 1.6 cm. Associated injuries included mandible fractures in 37% of patients. Broad-spectrum antibiotics were given to 95% of the patients. The initial management involved immediate surgical exploration in 55% of the total number of patients, with 83% of the surgically explored patients undergoing tracheotomy. The remaining 45% of patients were managed without surgery. Complications occurred only in operative patients, with aspiration occurring in 10%, bilateral hypoglossal nerve paralysis in 5%, and vocal cord paralysis in 5%. None of the patients developed postinjury or operative abscess.
CONCLUSION: The findings show that suspected upper aerodigestive tract injury can be managed without surgery but that a high index of suspicion for airway compromise and associated facial injuries must be considered.
HYPOTHESIS: Upper aerodigestive tract injury may lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Historically, this kind of injury has been managed by immediate surgical exploration, repair, and drainage. More recently, a nonoperative approach has been advocated.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of patients admitted to the University of Louisville Trauma Center with suspected upper aerodigestive tract injury.
METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 236 patients admitted to the trauma service from 1995 to 1999 with the diagnosis of aerodigestive tract injury or subcutaneous emphysema.
RESULTS: Nineteen patients were identified with cervical emphysema or cervical crepitance, or both, thought to be caused by an upper aerodigestive tract injury. The average patient age was 38.5 years; 68% of patients were men. The mechanisms of injury were motor vehicle accident (43%), gunshot wound (37%), assault (10%), blunt neck trauma (5%), and stabbing (5%). Each patient presented with cervical emphysema shown by radiograph or crepitance, or both; 21% had dysphagia and 63% were hoarse or had stridor. Location of the injury was tracheal or laryngeal in 37%, hypopharyngeal in 27%, oral pharynx in 16%, esophageal in 5%, and unidentified in 15% of patients. Because of suspected aerodigestive tract injury, 79% of patients were taken to the operating room for direct laryngoscopy and esophagoscopy, and abnormalities were found in 80%. The diameter of the average laceration of the upper aerodigestive tract was 1.6 cm. Associated injuries included mandible fractures in 37% of patients. Broad-spectrum antibiotics were given to 95% of the patients. The initial management involved immediate surgical exploration in 55% of the total number of patients, with 83% of the surgically explored patients undergoing tracheotomy. The remaining 45% of patients were managed without surgery. Complications occurred only in operative patients, with aspiration occurring in 10%, bilateral hypoglossal nerve paralysis in 5%, and vocal cord paralysis in 5%. None of the patients developed postinjury or operative abscess.
CONCLUSION: The findings show that suspected upper aerodigestive tract injury can be managed without surgery but that a high index of suspicion for airway compromise and associated facial injuries must be considered.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAgedDiagnosis, DifferentialEsophagoscopyEsophagusFemaleGlottisHumansHypopharynxLaryngoscopyMaleMediastinal EmphysemaMiddle AgedNeck InjuriesOropharynxPatient Care TeamPneumothoraxRetrospective StudiesSubcutaneous EmphysemaTomography, X-Ray ComputedWounds, NonpenetratingWounds, Penetrating