Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2023
Usefulness of large beam-shaping filters at different tube voltages of newborn chest CT.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Masuda Takanori, Funama Yoshinori, Nakaura Takeshi, Sato Tomoyasu, Urayama Kotaro, Kiguchi Masao, Oku Takayuki, Yoshida Masato, Arao Shinichi, Ono Atsushi, Hiratsuka Junichi, Awai Kazuo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: To investigate optimizing the use of different beam shaping filters (viz. small, medium and large) when using different tube voltages during the newborn chest computed tomography (CT) on a GE Lightspeed VCT scanner.
METHODS: We used pediatric anthropomorphic phantoms with a 64 detector-row CT scanner while scanning the chest. A real-time skin dosimeter (RD - 1000; Trek Corporation, Kanagawa, Japan) was positioned into the phantom center of the body, the surface of the body back, and the right and left mammary glands. We performed and compared six scan protocols using small, medium, and large beam shaping filters at 80 and 120 kVp protocols.
RESULT: There were no significant differences in the image noise for the chest scan among the different beam shaping filters. By using the large beam shaping filter at 80 kVp, it was possible to reduce the exposure dose by 5% in comparison with the small beam shaping filter, and by 10% in comparison with the medium beam shaping filter. By using the large beam shaping filter at 120 kVp, it was possible to reduce the exposure dose by 15% in comparison with the small beam shaping filter and by 20% in comparison with the medium beam shaping filter (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The large beam shaping filter had the most dose reduction effect during newborn chest CT on a GE Lightspeed VCT scanner. The additional copper filtration being present in the large bowtie filter of the GE Lightspeed CT scanner when using different tube voltages is more effective in reducing radiation exposure in children.
METHODS: We used pediatric anthropomorphic phantoms with a 64 detector-row CT scanner while scanning the chest. A real-time skin dosimeter (RD - 1000; Trek Corporation, Kanagawa, Japan) was positioned into the phantom center of the body, the surface of the body back, and the right and left mammary glands. We performed and compared six scan protocols using small, medium, and large beam shaping filters at 80 and 120 kVp protocols.
RESULT: There were no significant differences in the image noise for the chest scan among the different beam shaping filters. By using the large beam shaping filter at 80 kVp, it was possible to reduce the exposure dose by 5% in comparison with the small beam shaping filter, and by 10% in comparison with the medium beam shaping filter. By using the large beam shaping filter at 120 kVp, it was possible to reduce the exposure dose by 15% in comparison with the small beam shaping filter and by 20% in comparison with the medium beam shaping filter (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The large beam shaping filter had the most dose reduction effect during newborn chest CT on a GE Lightspeed VCT scanner. The additional copper filtration being present in the large bowtie filter of the GE Lightspeed CT scanner when using different tube voltages is more effective in reducing radiation exposure in children.