MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12944-020-01289-5

Медицинская библиотека · Lipids in health and disease · 2020

Achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets as assessed by different methods in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia: an analysis from the HELLAS-FH registry.

Rizos Christos V, Florentin Matilda, Skoumas Ioannis, Tziomalos Konstantinos, Rallidis Loukianos, Kotsis Vasileios, Athyros Vasileios, Skalidis Emmanouil, Kolovou Genovefa, Garoufi Anastasia, Bilianou Eleni, Koutagiar Iosif, Agapakis Dimitrios, Kiouri Estela, Antza Christina, Katsiki Niki, Zacharis Evangelos, Attilakos Achilleas, Sfikas George, Anagnostis Panagiotis, Panagiotakos Demosthenes B, Liberopoulos Evangelos N

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is characterized by elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. FH patients often have increased lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels, which further increase CVD risk. Novel methods for accurately calculating LDL-C have been proposed.

METHODS

Patients with FH were recruited by a network of Greek sites participating in the HELLAS-FH registry. LDL-C levels were calculated using the Friedewald (LDL-CF) and the Martin/Hopkins (LDL-CM/H) equations as well as after correcting LDL-CM/H for Lp(a) levels [LDL-CLp(a)corM/H]. The objective was to compare LDL-C levels and target achievement as estimated by different methods in FH patients.

RESULTS

This analysis included 1620 patients (1423 adults and 197 children). In adults at diagnosis, LDL-CF and LDL-CM/H levels were similar [235 ± 70 mg/dL (6.1 ± 1.8 mmol/L) vs 235 ± 69 mg/dL (6.1 ± 1.8 mmol/L), respectively; P = NS], while LDL-CLp(a)corM/H levels were non-significantly lower than LDL-CF [211 ± 61 mg/dL (5.5 ± 1.6 mmol/L); P = 0.432]. In treated adults (n = 966) both LDL-CF [150 ± 71 mg/dL (3.9 ± 1.8 mmol/L)] and LDL-CM/H levels [151 ± 70 mg/dL (6.1 ± 1.8 mmol/L); P = 0.746] were similar, whereas LDL-CLp(a)corM/H levels were significantly lower than LDL-CF [121 ± 62 mg/dL (3.1 ± 1.6 mmol/L); P < 0.001]. Target achievement as per latest guidelines in treated patients using the LDL-CM/H (2.5%) and especially LDL-CLp(a)corM/H methods (10.7%) were significantly different than LDL-CF (2.9%; P < 0.001). In children, all 3 formulas resulted in similar LDL-C levels, both at diagnosis and in treated patients. However, target achievement by LDL-CF was lower compared with LDL-CM/H and LDL-CLp(a)corM/H methods (22.1 vs 24.8 vs 33.3%; P < 0.001 for both comparisons).

CONCLUSION

LDL-CLp(a)corM/H results in significantly lower values and higher target achievement rate in both treated adults and children. If validated in clinical trials, LDL-CLp(a)corM/H may become the method of choice to more accurately estimate 'true' LDL-C levels in FH patients.

Для цитирования: Rizos Christos V, Florentin Matilda, Skoumas Ioannis, Tziomalos Konstantinos, Rallidis Loukianos, Kotsis Vasileios, Athyros Vasileios, Skalidis Emmanouil, Kolovou Genovefa, Garoufi Anastasia, Bilianou Eleni, Koutagiar Iosif, Agapakis Dimitrios, Kiouri Estela, Antza Christina, Katsiki Niki, Zacharis Evangelos, Attilakos Achilleas, Sfikas George, Anagnostis Panagiotis, Panagiotakos Demosthenes B, Liberopoulos Evangelos N. Achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets as assessed by different methods in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia: an analysis from the HELLAS-FH registry.. Lipids in health and disease. 2020. DOI: 10.1186/s12944-020-01289-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.