Medical ultrasonography · 2018
Interconversion of elasticity measurements between two-dimensional shear wave elastography and transient elastography.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kim Yeun-Yoon, Kim Myung-Joon, Shin Hyun Joo, Yoon Haesung, Kim Ha Yan, Lee Mi-Jung
Аннотация
AIMS: To enable comparison and interconversion of elasticity measurements between two-dimensional (2D) shear wave elastography (SWE) and transient elastography (TE).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Elasticities of three phantoms were measured by 2D SWE (supersonic shear imaging) using four probes and TE using two probes. We performed regression analyses to evaluate correlation between the measurements and phantom elasticities, and make converting equations. In pediatric biliary atresia patients who had stiffness measurements by both 2D SWE and TE within 1-year interval, TE measurements were retrospectively converted into correlating 2D SWE values. We compared the calculated values with 2D SWE measurements by intraclass correlation coefficient.
RESULTS: Measurements in phantoms varied according to elastography method and probe selection. However, the measurement by both 2D SWE (R2, 0.974-0.985; p<0.001) and TE (R2, 0.996-0.999; p<0.001) showedsignificant linear correlation with phantom elasticity in all probe settings. From 67 biliary atresia patients (age, 2 months-20 years), agreements between the measured and calculated values were excellent in all 88 examinations within 1-year interval(ρ=0.828; p<0.001) and in 63 examinations within 2-month interval (ρ=0.863, p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The equations enabledinterconversion of elasticity values among different probes of 2D SWE and TE and provided reliable estimation of elasticityvalues for different probe settings in biliary atresia patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Elasticities of three phantoms were measured by 2D SWE (supersonic shear imaging) using four probes and TE using two probes. We performed regression analyses to evaluate correlation between the measurements and phantom elasticities, and make converting equations. In pediatric biliary atresia patients who had stiffness measurements by both 2D SWE and TE within 1-year interval, TE measurements were retrospectively converted into correlating 2D SWE values. We compared the calculated values with 2D SWE measurements by intraclass correlation coefficient.
RESULTS: Measurements in phantoms varied according to elastography method and probe selection. However, the measurement by both 2D SWE (R2, 0.974-0.985; p<0.001) and TE (R2, 0.996-0.999; p<0.001) showedsignificant linear correlation with phantom elasticity in all probe settings. From 67 biliary atresia patients (age, 2 months-20 years), agreements between the measured and calculated values were excellent in all 88 examinations within 1-year interval(ρ=0.828; p<0.001) and in 63 examinations within 2-month interval (ρ=0.863, p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The equations enabledinterconversion of elasticity values among different probes of 2D SWE and TE and provided reliable estimation of elasticityvalues for different probe settings in biliary atresia patients.