Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2022
A survival analysis of bipolar steroid-eluting and unipolar nonsteroid-eluting epicardial leads.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fazelifar Amir Farjam, Taghavyan Nina Jalily, Moeeni Mahdi, Baharestani Bahador, Shahandashti Farshad Jalili, Haghjoo Majid, Hoseini Saeed, Kamali Farzad, Madadi Shabnam, Yoonesi Ali Asghar, Koolaji Sogol
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Epicardial pacemakers are known as an alternative for endocardial pacemakers in some cases such as heart block, and complex congenital heart diseases. Considering recent advances and improvement of epicardial lead subtypes, it is essential to investigate the long-term function of them. In this study, we aimed to assess the sensing and pacing characteristics, and survival of bipolar steroid-eluting and unipolar nonsteroid-eluting epicardial pacemakers.
METHODS: We conducted an entirely concentrated search on the documents of all patients who had undergone epicardial lead implantation in the Shaheed Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical & Research Center during 2015-2018. Implant, and follow-up data were extracted. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Weibull regression hazards model were applied for the survival analysis.
RESULTS: Eighty-nine leads were implanted for 77 patients. Of the total leads, 52.81%, 53.93%, and 47.19% were implanted in children (under 18-year-old), females, and patients with congenital heart diseases, respectively. Bipolar steroid-eluting leads comprised 33.71% of 89 leads. The pacing threshold of unipolar nonsteroid-eluting leads that were implanted on the left ventricle and right atrium increased significantly during the follow-up to greater records than bipolar steroid-eluting leads. Survival analysis also revealed that bipolar steroid-eluting leads are significantly better in 48-month survival (Weibull hazard ratio [HR]: 0.13 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.02-0.99), p = .049). Age, ventricular location of the lead, and acute pacing characteristics were not associated with survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar steroid-eluting epicardial leads have an acceptable survival compared with unipolar nonsteroid-eluting, without a significant difference regarding patients age. Therefore, they could be an excellent alternative for endocardial ones.
METHODS: We conducted an entirely concentrated search on the documents of all patients who had undergone epicardial lead implantation in the Shaheed Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical & Research Center during 2015-2018. Implant, and follow-up data were extracted. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Weibull regression hazards model were applied for the survival analysis.
RESULTS: Eighty-nine leads were implanted for 77 patients. Of the total leads, 52.81%, 53.93%, and 47.19% were implanted in children (under 18-year-old), females, and patients with congenital heart diseases, respectively. Bipolar steroid-eluting leads comprised 33.71% of 89 leads. The pacing threshold of unipolar nonsteroid-eluting leads that were implanted on the left ventricle and right atrium increased significantly during the follow-up to greater records than bipolar steroid-eluting leads. Survival analysis also revealed that bipolar steroid-eluting leads are significantly better in 48-month survival (Weibull hazard ratio [HR]: 0.13 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.02-0.99), p = .049). Age, ventricular location of the lead, and acute pacing characteristics were not associated with survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar steroid-eluting epicardial leads have an acceptable survival compared with unipolar nonsteroid-eluting, without a significant difference regarding patients age. Therefore, they could be an excellent alternative for endocardial ones.