Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2021
A critical re-analysis of cases of post-transplantation recurrence in genetic nephrotic syndrome.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mason Anna E, Saleem Moin A, Bierzynska Agnieszka
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Genetic defects in podocyte proteins account for up to 30% of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) in the paediatric population. Most children with genetic SRNS are resistant to immunosuppression and at high risk of progression to stage 5 chronic kidney disease. Kidney transplantation is often the treatment of choice. The possibility of post-transplantation disease recurrence in genetic SRNS remains controversial, and poses fundamental questions about disease biology.
METHODS: We critically evaluated the published cases of post-transplantation recurrence in genetic patients, particularly testing 'mutations' against the most recent population variant databases, in order to clarify the diagnoses, and compare the clinical courses and responses to therapy.
RESULTS: Biallelic pathogenic variants in NPHS1 leading to a complete absence of nephrin were the most commonly reported and best understood instance of nephrotic syndrome occurring post-transplantation. This is an immune-mediated process driven by antibody production against the novel nephrin protein in the allograft. We also identified a number of plausible reported cases of post-transplantation recurrence involving pathogenic variants in NPHS2 (8 patients, biallelic), one in WT1 (monoallelic) and one in NUP93 (biallelic). However, the mechanism for recurrence in these cases remains unclear. Other instances of recurrence in genetic disease were difficult to interpret due to differing clinical criteria, inclusion of patients without true pathogenic variants or the influence of other factors on renal outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, post-transplantation recurrence remains very rare in patients with genetic SRNS. It appears to occur later after transplantation than in other patients and usually responds well to plasmapheresis with a good renal outcome.
METHODS: We critically evaluated the published cases of post-transplantation recurrence in genetic patients, particularly testing 'mutations' against the most recent population variant databases, in order to clarify the diagnoses, and compare the clinical courses and responses to therapy.
RESULTS: Biallelic pathogenic variants in NPHS1 leading to a complete absence of nephrin were the most commonly reported and best understood instance of nephrotic syndrome occurring post-transplantation. This is an immune-mediated process driven by antibody production against the novel nephrin protein in the allograft. We also identified a number of plausible reported cases of post-transplantation recurrence involving pathogenic variants in NPHS2 (8 patients, biallelic), one in WT1 (monoallelic) and one in NUP93 (biallelic). However, the mechanism for recurrence in these cases remains unclear. Other instances of recurrence in genetic disease were difficult to interpret due to differing clinical criteria, inclusion of patients without true pathogenic variants or the influence of other factors on renal outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, post-transplantation recurrence remains very rare in patients with genetic SRNS. It appears to occur later after transplantation than in other patients and usually responds well to plasmapheresis with a good renal outcome.