MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7534/j.issn.1009-2137.2018.02.032

Медицинская библиотека · Zhongguo shi yan xue ye xue za zhi · 2018

[Safety and Effectiveness of Ruxolitinib for Treatment of Myeloproliferative Neoplasm: A Meta-Analysis].

Yang Zhi-Rui, Zhu Hai-Yan

СтатьяМетаанализПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasm.

METHODS

Random clinical trials (~September 30, 2017) were identified from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinical Trials, CBM and Chinese Journal Full-text Database. The quality of RCT was assessed by Cochrane risk bias. Meta analysis was performed with Revman 5.3.

RESULTS

Ruxolitinib was efficacious in relieving splenomegaly (RR 49.12, 95% CI [15.81-152.59], P<0.001). The incidence of anemia significantly increased after ruxolitinib treatment (RR 1.71, 95% CI [1.05-2.77], P=0.16), while the thrombocytopenia (RR 1.04, 95% CI [0.50-2.16], P=0.92) and neutropenia (RR 2.46, 95% CI [0.91-6.61], P=0.07) had no statistical difference as compared with that in control group. Ischemia events had no significant difference as compared with control (RR 0.57, 95% CI [0.33-1.00], P=0.05). Infection events had no significant difference as compared with the control group (RR 1.18, 95% CI [0.79-1.78], P=0.24).

CONCLUSION

Ruxolitinib is an efficacious therapeutic strategy on MPD with controlling splenomegaly. However,anemia events and bleeding events may threat its clinical safety, so more high quality RCT are needed.

Для цитирования: Yang Zhi-Rui, Zhu Hai-Yan. [Safety and Effectiveness of Ruxolitinib for Treatment of Myeloproliferative Neoplasm: A Meta-Analysis].. Zhongguo shi yan xue ye xue za zhi. 2018. DOI: 10.7534/j.issn.1009-2137.2018.02.032.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.