Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2017
Impact of Chemoradiation After Supra- or Infrahyoid Cancer on Aerodynamic, Subjective, and Objective Voice Assessments: A Multicenter Prospective Study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lechien Jérôme R, Khalife Mohamad, Huet Kathy, Fourneau Anne-Francoise, Delvaux Véronique, Piccaluga Myriam, Harmegnies Bernard, Saussez Sven
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to investigate the impact of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on speech and voice quality according to the anatomic localization of the head and neck cancer.
METHODS: Thirty-four patients treated by CRT for advanced suprahyoid (N = 17) or infrahyoid (N = 17) cancer were assessed for speech function, videolaryngostroboscopy, Voice Handicap Index, blinded Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain, and Instability, acoustic measurements, and aerodynamic measurements. Quality of life was evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Head and Neck 35 (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) questionnaire.
RESULTS: Patients treated for an infrahyoid tumor presented more severe values of Voice Handicap Index items, dysphonia, breathiness, asthenia, and some acoustic cues (Voice Turbulence Index, Soft Phonation Index, degree of unvoiced segments, and number of unvoiced segments) than patients treated for a suprahyoid tumor. The EORTC QLQ-H&N35 communication item was better in the suprahyoid patient group.
CONCLUSIONS: Voice quality impairments associated with CRT are more severe in patients treated for advanced infrahyoid cancer, suggesting the need to develop specific posttherapy management of the dysphonia according to the tumor anatomical localization.
METHODS: Thirty-four patients treated by CRT for advanced suprahyoid (N = 17) or infrahyoid (N = 17) cancer were assessed for speech function, videolaryngostroboscopy, Voice Handicap Index, blinded Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain, and Instability, acoustic measurements, and aerodynamic measurements. Quality of life was evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Head and Neck 35 (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) questionnaire.
RESULTS: Patients treated for an infrahyoid tumor presented more severe values of Voice Handicap Index items, dysphonia, breathiness, asthenia, and some acoustic cues (Voice Turbulence Index, Soft Phonation Index, degree of unvoiced segments, and number of unvoiced segments) than patients treated for a suprahyoid tumor. The EORTC QLQ-H&N35 communication item was better in the suprahyoid patient group.
CONCLUSIONS: Voice quality impairments associated with CRT are more severe in patients treated for advanced infrahyoid cancer, suggesting the need to develop specific posttherapy management of the dysphonia according to the tumor anatomical localization.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AcousticsBelgiumChemoradiotherapyCranial IrradiationCross-Sectional StudiesDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansLaryngoscopyMaleMiddle AgedMouth NeoplasmsOtorhinolaryngologic NeoplasmsPhonationProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSpeech AcousticsSpeech Production MeasurementStroboscopySurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeVideo RecordingVoice DisordersVoice Quality