MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1006/pmed.2002.1055

Медицинская библиотека · Preventive medicine · 2002

Prevention of Lyme disease in Dutch children: analysis of determinants of tick inspection by parents.

de Vries Hein, van Dillen Sonja

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

This study examined factors that discriminate between parents who regularly inspect their children for ticks and those who do not do so.

METHODS

Knowledge, cognitive and emotional attitudes, social influences, and self-efficacy expectations were assessed in 230 parents living in high endemic regions.

RESULTS

Regression analysis showed that moral norms, emotional attitude, anticipated regret, role models, and stress self-efficacy were positively associated with inspection behavior.

CONCLUSIONS

Health education programs not only need to stimulate parental knowledge and discuss the health effects of tick bite prevention, they also need to stress the emotional benefits of tick bite prevention for children and parents and induce positive norms toward inspecting others. Furthermore, they need to stimulate openness about inspection behaviors, since the modeling examples of partners, relatives, and grandparents and the behavior of friends discriminate between inspecting and noninspecting parents. Finally, education programs should clearly indicate how tick inspection works, how the need for it should be communicated to the children, and how to take enough time to do it.

Для цитирования: de Vries Hein, van Dillen Sonja. Prevention of Lyme disease in Dutch children: analysis of determinants of tick inspection by parents.. Preventive medicine. 2002. DOI: 10.1006/pmed.2002.1055.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.