MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jpurol.2007.06.008

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of pediatric urology · 2007

A new algorithm for management of chordee without hypospadias based on mobilization of urethra.

Bhat Amilal, Saxena Gajendra, Abrol Nitin

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility of chordee correction by mobilization of urethra with corpus spongiosum, and define the guidelines for management of chordee without hypospadias.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

We reviewed 25 cases of chordee without hypospadias, managed in 1992-2005. Age of patients ranged from 3 to 28years (mean 14.4years). Chordee correction was performed on a case-by-case basis by skin de-gloving, mobilization of divergent corpus spongiosum, mobilization of hypoplastic urethra, mobilization of proximal urethra up to bulbar urethra, dorsal plication and division/resection of hypoplastic urethra with main emphasis on mobilization of urethra, and confirmed by Gittes test.

RESULTS

Chordee correction was possible by mobilization of urethra after penile degloving in 76% of cases and dorsal plication after urethral mobilization in 8%. Only 16% required division/resection of hypoplastic urethra. None of them had residual chordee in follow-up period of 6months-3years (mean of 26months). After fistula repair and internal urethrotomy in one patient each, a second surgery had 100% success.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose an algorithm based on mobilization of urethra that defines the etiology and guidelines for the management of chordee without hypospadias.

Для цитирования: Bhat Amilal, Saxena Gajendra, Abrol Nitin. A new algorithm for management of chordee without hypospadias based on mobilization of urethra.. Journal of pediatric urology. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2007.06.008.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.