DOI 10.1097/scs.0000000000007561
Cleft Care Packages and the Impact on Postoperative Care Following a Primary Cleft Lip Repair.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To provide caregivers with all the resources needed to care for a surgical site following a primary cleft lip repair and evaluate its efficacy on postoperative care.
SETTING/
PARTICIPANTS
Caregivers of infants ages 3 to 6 months with a cleft lip and/or palate undergoing a primary repair at the Texas Children's Hospital.
METHODS
Packages were given to caregivers at discharge following repair. Packages included instructions and supplies needed for surgical site care. At discharge an advanced practice provider obtained informed consent and a questionnaire that established baseline knowledge of surgical site care. Following the questionnaire, the advanced practice provider demonstrated how to care for the site using the package provided. Assessment of scar healing, nasal stent compliance, and ease of care was evaluated at postoperative follow up.
RESULTS
Thirty-two families were enrolled in this study. Our data supports that caregivers who are provided resources to care for the site had increased comfort level, preparedness, and compliance rates following a primary cleft lip repair. Eighty-four percent of respondents strongly agreed that the package provided aided in preparedness for site care with 100% of respondents recommending the resources to future families undergoing a cleft lip repair.
CONCLUSIONS
Caregivers feel comfortable and equipped with their ability to care for their child's repaired cleft lip when given the appropriate instructions and supplies. In addition, they would recommend the packages to future families following a repair. Empowering families to be proactive in postoperative care will potentially lead to better outcomes in cleft care.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.