MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.01.004

Медицинская библиотека · Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease · 2017

Evaluation of a field test for antibodies against Chlamydia trachomatis during trachoma surveillance in Nepal.

Sun Michelle J, Zambrano Andrea I, Dize Laura, Munoz Beatriz, Gwyn Sarah, Mishra Sailesh, Martin Diana L, Sharma Shekhar, West Sheila K

Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Testing for antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis has potential as a surveillance tool. Our evaluation compares lateral flow assays (LFAs) during surveillance surveys in Nepal with Multiplex bead array (MBA). Fifty children were randomly sampled from each of 15 random clusters in two districts of Nepal. Finger prick blood samples were collected from 1509 children and tested onsite for anti-Pgp3 antibodies by LFA. The LFA was read at 30min as negative, positive, or invalid. Tests results were also rated as difficult to read ("equivocal"). Blood was processed at Johns Hopkins University using the MBA.

RESULTS

The LFA had agreement of 40.0% for MBA-positive samples and 99.3% for MBA-negative samples. Inter-reader reliability was kappa=0.65 (95% CI=0.56-0.74). If the equivocal results (7%) could be decreased, reliability could be improved.

CONCLUSIONS

Further optimization and testing of the LFA test are needed to improve agreement with MBA and the interpretation of the results.

Для цитирования: Sun Michelle J, Zambrano Andrea I, Dize Laura, Munoz Beatriz, Gwyn Sarah, Mishra Sailesh, Martin Diana L, Sharma Shekhar, West Sheila K. Evaluation of a field test for antibodies against Chlamydia trachomatis during trachoma surveillance in Nepal.. Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.01.004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.