MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.12.013

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2017

The Accuracy of Preoperative Rigid Stroboscopy in the Evaluation of Voice Disorders in Children.

Mansour Jobran, Amir Ofer, Sagiv Doron, Alon Eran E, Wolf Michael, Primov-Fever Adi

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Stroboscopy is considered the most appropriate tool for evaluating the function of the vocal folds but may harbor significant limitations in children. Still, direct laryngoscopy (DL), under general anesthesia, is regarded the "gold standard" for establishing a diagnosis of vocal fold pathology. The aim of the study is to examine the accuracy of preoperative rigid stroboscopy in children with voice disorders.

STUDY

DESIGN

This is a retrospective study.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on a cohort of 39 children with dysphonia, aged 4 to 18 years, who underwent DL. Twenty-six children underwent rigid stroboscopy (RS) prior to surgery and 13 children underwent fiber-optic laryngoscopy. The preoperative diagnoses were matched with intraoperative (DL) findings.

RESULTS

DL was found to contradict preoperative evaluations in 20 out of 39 children (51%) and in 26 out of 53 of the findings (49%). Overdiagnosis of cysts and underdiagnosis of sulci were noted in RS compared to DL. The overall rate of accuracy for RS was 64%.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of rigid stroboscopy in the evaluation of children with voice disorders was found to be similar with previous reports in adults.

Для цитирования: Mansour Jobran, Amir Ofer, Sagiv Doron, Alon Eran E, Wolf Michael, Primov-Fever Adi. The Accuracy of Preoperative Rigid Stroboscopy in the Evaluation of Voice Disorders in Children.. Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.12.013.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.