MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/02699052.2010.511589

Медицинская библиотека · Brain injury · 2010

Isokinetic strength training of lower limb muscles following acquired brain injury.

Killington M J, Mackintosh S F H, Ayres M B

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PRIMARY

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of isokinetic strength training of ankle and knee muscles in adults with chronic acquired brain injury (ABI).

RESEARCH

DESIGN

Series of single case studies.

METHODS

Twelve people with ABI participated in a 2.5-week baseline, 12-week intervention and a 4-week follow-up phase.

INTERVENTION: Concentric isokinetic exercise, twice a week, for plantarflexors (PFs), dorsiflexors (DFs), knee flexors (KFs) and knee extensors (KEs).

OUTCOMES: Peak torque and power at 60 and 90° s⁻¹, PFs and KFs tone at 60° s⁻¹, gait speed and timed chair rises.

RESULTS

For single case analyses strength improvements were noted in 11/12 participants' PFs, 5/12 participants' DFs and 7/12 participants' KEs and KFs. Gait speed improved in 8/12 participants and chair rise time improved in 7/12 participants. PFs tone increased in three participants, KFs tone increased in six participants and three participants reported knee pain. For group analyses, peak torque of PFs and KEs, fast gait speed and timed chair rises demonstrated improvement (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Isokinetic strength training may be effective to improve lower limb muscle strength; however, care needs to be taken in selecting suitable candidates as some individuals reported knee pain with this intensive programme.

Для цитирования: Killington M J, Mackintosh S F H, Ayres M B. Isokinetic strength training of lower limb muscles following acquired brain injury.. Brain injury. 2010. DOI: 10.3109/02699052.2010.511589.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.