MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/09603120701633529

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of environmental health research · 2007

Household latrine use, maintenance and acceptability in rural Zinder, Niger.

Diallo Mamadou O, Hopkins Donald R, Kane Mohamed S, Niandou Seydou, Amadou Ali, Kadri Boubacar, Amza Abdou, Emerson Paul M, Zingeser James A

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We conducted a survey in rural Niger to assess use, maintenance and acceptability of household latrines one year after a subsidized promotion project. Standard interviews were conducted with 200 randomly selected project participants and a visual latrine inspection. Before the project, 21.5% (43/200) of households had latrines. After the first year, 100% of these households had at least one latrine. Overall, 2577 household latrines were built in the 50 targeted villages. Latrines were 'always' used by 92.5% of adults and 55% of children in the households. The latrines were adequately maintained: superstructure 93%, covers 74.5%, clean 70%. The main perceived advantages of latrine ownership were proximity/easy access (59.5%) and privacy (22.5%). The project demonstrated that the implementation of a household latrine promotion project is acceptable and feasible in rural Niger. Future promotion projects may develop local sanitation expertise and focus on perceived benefits--proximity and privacy--rather than health.

Для цитирования: Diallo Mamadou O, Hopkins Donald R, Kane Mohamed S, Niandou Seydou, Amadou Ali, Kadri Boubacar, Amza Abdou, Emerson Paul M, Zingeser James A. Household latrine use, maintenance and acceptability in rural Zinder, Niger.. International journal of environmental health research. 2007. DOI: 10.1080/09603120701633529.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.