Keyhole surgery for giant basal brain tumors. Theoretical explanation with an example of trans-eyebrow subraorbital approach.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Improvement of modern neurosurgical technology has given rise to keyhole surgery for a wide range of pathologies. Supraorbital trans-eyebrow approach has been described in detail for small tumors of anterior cranial fossa and suprasellar neoplasms. Can we use this small and less traumatic approach for a more complex tumor extending beyond the suprasellar region?
OBJECTIVE
To analyze own experience of surgical treatment of large and giant parasellar tumors via supraorbital approach, to identify the principles of such operations, indications and possible limitations.
MATERIAL AND
METHODS
There were 58 resections of parasellar tumors via mini-supraorbital approach had been performed between 2016 and 2021 at the 2nd pediatric neurosurgical department. We selected 42 patients with large and giant tumors extending beyond the chiasmal-sellar zone and causing occlusive hydrocephalus (mean volume 44.2 cm3). Preoperative status of patients, postoperative clinical data and logistics of in-hospital treatment were analyzed.
RESULTS
Total resection was performed in all cases. No redo surgeries or revisions were required. There were no cases of wound infection, CSF leakage and damage to large vessels.
CONCLUSION
We standardized planning of surgeries for large neoplasms considering available knowledge about the nature of diseases, analysis of clinical and X-ray data, goals and objectives of surgery. The reader is offered a theoretical substantiation of applicability of keyhole surgery for chiasmal-sellar tumors on the example of well-known mini-supraorbital approach. We gave certain advices on planning such operations and illustrated clinical examples.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.