MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jpurol.2025.01.001

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of pediatric urology · 2025

Pediatric bladder tissue engineering: Where have we been and where do we go next?

Ramakrishnan Venkat M, Thaker Hatim, Ocampo Gabriel-Luis, Adam Rosalyn M, Estrada Carlos R

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to (a) provide a concise overview of early clinical trials in bladder tissue engineering and the associated challenges, (b) evaluate significant advancements over the past 15 years in addressing key limitations in angiogenesis, scaffolding, cell sourcing, and immunomodulation, and (c) explore the individual and synergistic contributions of each domain toward the development of a viable engineered solution.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Relevant papers for this narrative review were selected through a PubMed search for "bladder tissue engineering" studies published between 01/01/2009 and 12/31/2024, as well as earlier clinical trials that predate this period.

RESULTS

Along with reviewing four major clinical trials, this review highlights nearly 20 distinct studies that showcase progress in the critical domains of angiogenesis, scaffolding, cell sourcing, and immunomodulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Are we close to developing an off-the-shelf bladder substitute? Not yet. Current efforts are focused on addressing two major knowledge gaps: (a) the lack of testing in clinically relevant disease models and (b) the need for a more comprehensive understanding of engineered tissue physiology.

Для цитирования: Ramakrishnan Venkat M, Thaker Hatim, Ocampo Gabriel-Luis, Adam Rosalyn M, Estrada Carlos R. Pediatric bladder tissue engineering: Where have we been and where do we go next?. Journal of pediatric urology. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2025.01.001.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.