The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2020
Regional and practitioner variations in reporting infant mortality.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Polen-De Clarissa, Kamath-Rayne Beena D, Goyal Neera, DeFranco Emily
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Assess regional differences in categorization of preterm delivery outcomes and impact on variation in reported infant mortality rates.
STUDY DESIGN: A 27-item questionnaire was distributed to 1072 practitioners associated with U.S. birth hospitals. Five clinical scenarios were created to identify how participants classify delivery outcomes. Statistical analysis included Chi-square analysis and multinomial logistic regression.
RESULTS: 234 questionnaires were completed (response rate 22%). While >90% respondents classified a 14-week pregnancy loss with no sign of life as a miscarriage, only 22% would provide a fetal death certificate. Likewise, 37% would provide a certificate of live birth for a loss at 16 weeks with signs of life. There was notable regional variation in classifying these as live births (Northeast: 41%, Midwest: 44%, South: 13%, and West: 18%, p = .003).
CONCLUSION: Regional practice variation in recording both live births and stillbirths was noted. Greater standardization in reporting practices may be warranted to improve the accuracy of reported birth outcomes in the U.S.
STUDY DESIGN: A 27-item questionnaire was distributed to 1072 practitioners associated with U.S. birth hospitals. Five clinical scenarios were created to identify how participants classify delivery outcomes. Statistical analysis included Chi-square analysis and multinomial logistic regression.
RESULTS: 234 questionnaires were completed (response rate 22%). While >90% respondents classified a 14-week pregnancy loss with no sign of life as a miscarriage, only 22% would provide a fetal death certificate. Likewise, 37% would provide a certificate of live birth for a loss at 16 weeks with signs of life. There was notable regional variation in classifying these as live births (Northeast: 41%, Midwest: 44%, South: 13%, and West: 18%, p = .003).
CONCLUSION: Regional practice variation in recording both live births and stillbirths was noted. Greater standardization in reporting practices may be warranted to improve the accuracy of reported birth outcomes in the U.S.