MedElevator
Войти в исследования Headache · 2016
No Relationship Between Patent Foramen Ovale and Migraine Frequency.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Larrosa Davinia, Ramón César, Alvarez Rocío, Martínez-Camblor Pablo, Cernuda Eva, Pascual Julio
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Pathophysiology of migraine is not fully known. A link has been proposed between migraine and patent foramen ovale (PFO). However, there are conflicting data regarding the causal relationship between PFO and migraine.
OBJECTIVE: To test a potential association between migraine frequency and PFO by way of an observational, single-center, case-controlled study.
METHODS: We studied a total of 130 chronic migraine (CM) and 53 episodic migraine (EM) patients. Transcranial Doppler with agitated saline injection was used to evaluate the presence and degree of PFO. PFO was judged to be present if any signal was detected. The degree of PFO during rest and Valsalva was quantified as follows: small (1-10 microbubbles [MB]), medium (10-25 MB), or large (>25 MB with shower or curtain pattern). PFO detected at rest were considered permanent, while those detected during Valsalva maneuver were classified as latent.
RESULTS: The prevalence of PFO was similar in CM and EM patients (53.1% [44.1-62.2] vs 54.7% [40.3-69.1], P = .871). PFO size was significantly larger in the EM group compared to the CM group (35.8% vs 20.3%, P = .037). The presence of permanent PFO was also significantly higher in EM compared to CM (37.7% vs 22.7%, P = .044). No differences were found according to the presence of aura.
CONCLUSION: This study indicates that PFO is not more common or larger in CM than in EM patients. These findings do not support a relationship between PFO and migraine frequency.
OBJECTIVE: To test a potential association between migraine frequency and PFO by way of an observational, single-center, case-controlled study.
METHODS: We studied a total of 130 chronic migraine (CM) and 53 episodic migraine (EM) patients. Transcranial Doppler with agitated saline injection was used to evaluate the presence and degree of PFO. PFO was judged to be present if any signal was detected. The degree of PFO during rest and Valsalva was quantified as follows: small (1-10 microbubbles [MB]), medium (10-25 MB), or large (>25 MB with shower or curtain pattern). PFO detected at rest were considered permanent, while those detected during Valsalva maneuver were classified as latent.
RESULTS: The prevalence of PFO was similar in CM and EM patients (53.1% [44.1-62.2] vs 54.7% [40.3-69.1], P = .871). PFO size was significantly larger in the EM group compared to the CM group (35.8% vs 20.3%, P = .037). The presence of permanent PFO was also significantly higher in EM compared to CM (37.7% vs 22.7%, P = .044). No differences were found according to the presence of aura.
CONCLUSION: This study indicates that PFO is not more common or larger in CM than in EM patients. These findings do not support a relationship between PFO and migraine frequency.