MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/mus.27119

Медицинская библиотека · Muscle & nerve · 2020

Walking activity in a large cohort of boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Lott Donovan J, Taivassalo Tanja, Senesac Claudia R, Willcocks Rebecca J, Harrington Ann M, Zilke Kirsten, Cunkle Hilary, Powers Catherine, Finanger Erika L, Rooney William D, Tennekoon Gihan I, Vandenborne Krista

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

In this study we explored walking activity in a large cohort of boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD).

METHODS

Step activity (monitored for 7 days), functional ability, and strength were quantified in ambulatory boys (5-12.9 years of age) with DMD and unaffected boys. Ambulatory status was determined 2 years later.

RESULTS

Two to 5 days of activity monitoring predicted weekly step activity (adjusted R2 = 0.80-0.95). Age comparisons revealed significant declines for step activity with increasing age, and relationships were found between step activity with both function and strength (P < .01). Our regression model predicted 36.5% of the variance in step activity. Those who were still ambulatory after 2 years demonstrated baseline step activity nearly double that of those who were no longer walking 2 years later (P < .01).

DISCUSSION: Step activity for DMD is related to and predictive of functional declines, which may be useful for clinical trials.

Для цитирования: Lott Donovan J, Taivassalo Tanja, Senesac Claudia R, Willcocks Rebecca J, Harrington Ann M, Zilke Kirsten, Cunkle Hilary, Powers Catherine, Finanger Erika L, Rooney William D, Tennekoon Gihan I, Vandenborne Krista. Walking activity in a large cohort of boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.. Muscle & nerve. 2020. DOI: 10.1002/mus.27119.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.