MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00247-006-0291-2

Медицинская библиотека · Pediatric radiology · 2006

Facial infiltrative lipomatosis.

Haloi Achyut K, Ditchfield Michael, Penington Anthony, Phillips Roderic

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Although there are multiple case reports and small series concerning facial infiltrative lipomatosis, there is no composite radiological description of the condition.

OBJECTIVE

Radiological evaluation of facial infiltrative lipomatosis using plain film, sonography, CT and MRI.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

We radiologically evaluated four patients with facial infiltrative lipomatosis. Initial plain radiographs of the face were acquired in all patients. Three children had an initial sonographic examination to evaluate the condition, followed by MRI. One child had a CT and then MRI.

RESULTS

One child had abnormalities on plain radiographs. Sonographically, the lesions were seen as ill-defined heterogeneously hypoechoic areas with indistinct margins. On CT images, the lesions did not have a homogeneous fat density but showed some relatively more dense areas in deeper parts of the lesions. MRI provided better delineation of the exact extent of the process and characterization of facial infiltrative lipomatosis.

CONCLUSION

Facial infiltrative lipomatosis should be considered as a differential diagnosis of vascular or lymphatic malformation when a child presents with unilateral facial swelling. MRI is the most useful single imaging modality to evaluate the condition, as it provides the best delineation of the exact extent of the process.

Для цитирования: Haloi Achyut K, Ditchfield Michael, Penington Anthony, Phillips Roderic. Facial infiltrative lipomatosis.. Pediatric radiology. 2006. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-006-0291-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.