MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2006.00603.x

Медицинская библиотека · Acta neurologica Scandinavica · 2006

Cognitive impairments in acute lacunar stroke.

Fure B, Bruun Wyller T, Engedal K, Thommessen B

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The present study investigated the prevalence of cognitive deficits in acute lacunar stroke, validated the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) in detecting cognitive impairments in lacunar patients, and identified predictors of such deficits.

METHODS

Seventy-one patients with lacunar stroke performed a comprehensive cognitive screening between day 2 and day 7 of their stay. The test battery included Trail Making Test A, Verbal Fluency, Object Learning Test, Ullevål Aphasia Screening, and Assessment of Stroke and other Brain Damage regarding motor apraxia, rational apraxia and visuospatial ability.

RESULTS

Exactly 57.7% scored outside cutoff in at least one of the cognitive tests. Using a rigorous cutoff for MMSE (28/29 points) and the test battery as comparison, the sensitivity and specificity of MMSE were 0.69 and 0.67, respectively. Only male sex was significantly related to the presence of cognitive deficits (pathologic score on at least one of the tests--odds ratio 4.41, 95% confidence interval 1.45-13.43).

CONCLUSION

Many lacunar stroke patients suffer cognitive problems. Male patients are at particular risk. MMSE failed to identify 30% of the patients diagnosed with cognitive deficits, and we suggest that lacunar stroke patients be offered a comprehensive cognitive screening, even when MMSE is normal.

Для цитирования: Fure B, Bruun Wyller T, Engedal K, Thommessen B. Cognitive impairments in acute lacunar stroke.. Acta neurologica Scandinavica. 2006. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2006.00603.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.